"It is unlawful to intentionally use any label that has been voided or refunded to ship a package through the U.S. Postal Service, or to duplicate a label for reuse."THEY canceled the transaction...AFTER I had already received a confirmation and took it to be shipped! THEY still had my money captured and now they want me to pay them again and are calling me UNLAWFUL? I don't think so! I followed their instructions to pay for the postage AGAIN and I am waiting to see if they give me my other funds back. I, then, wrote a formal complaint to the USPS. I seriously doubt I'll ever hear back from them and I am disinclined to use their website anymore. I guess that's why UPS is so popular. I'd send them a free copy of my book, Say What You Mean When You're in Business, but I doubt anyone would read it. And they want to run health care? A public service announcement from the folks at Art of Eloquence.com *NOTE* I am closing the comments on this blogpost due to HUNDREDS of SPAM messages I receive per day which are picking up on the SEO of these key words.
I am a postal thief
6 comments
-
Thanks Becky Joie.
I feel that those who handle the mail do a fabulous job. My dh and I were just talking about that the other day as I stated in the original post. They may not be able to guarantee that ever piece of mail will reach its destination exactly on time but I have never in long recent history had a problem with any piece of mail I have had go out and I have used it a LOT! Considering the volume they do, that is an amazing accomplishment!I will continue using the USPS, but I will NOT use the website to “Click N Ship” ever again. The website is very poorly run and I have had nothing but problems with it for the last several years. It’s just going to be a royal pain to travel so far just to mail one little package to my college dd.
I have tried to find info on who owns the Postal Service but I am unable to. I found several entries in Wikipedia that say it is government owned. I found a few Wiki Answers that say it is an “independent establishment of the executive branch” of the United States Government (see 39 U.S.C. § 201)" and that it is a “quasi government agency” which is “wholly owned by the government and controlled by the Presidential appointees and the Postmaster General.” having “many special privileges, including sovereign immunity, eminent domain powers, powers to negotiate postal treaties with foreign nations, and an exclusive legal right to deliver first-class and third-class mail.”
I tried to find the information on the USPS.com site but was unable to locate it. Can you direct me?
Lady Hawk, I do have an update but I’m afraid there is no resolution. I received an email from a USPS representative who didn’t read my complaint very closely. He directed me to pay the amount due which I had already said I did. He told me that I must have canceled the transaction instead of clicking “yes” (meaning the postage had printed correctly). However I had already told him that I did not cancel the transaction and had received a confirmation afterward that it went through correctly. Then he told me that in order to get my money back I had to request a refund along with various paperwork proving I was deserving. My understanding was that when they captured funds and didn’t take the money (transaction was canceled) the money is automatically returned in 10 days or so.
I emailed him back pointing out these issues and he emailed me back again saying he was escalating the matter.
It is very common, yet frustrating, for customer service reps (I was one for 7 years) not to thoroughly read through an email and answer the wrong issue or point the customer to the wrong resolution. Many times the rep merely emails back a standard form answer without reading the complaint at all, but I don’t believe this is what happened in this case. The response was more specific and thoughtful but it was not an answer to the issues I raised.
I doubt I will ever hear back. While I commend the individuals who handle the mail, I still think this site is run very poorly. I also think the response to this type of glitch could have been worded more carefully so as not to have called me unlawful and accuse me of fraud.