I didn’t say what I just said

I usually have a Friday Funny for you at the end of the week, but this Friday is a bit different.  On Monday, I shared my review of the latest political ads.  I don’t think President Obama’s ads are working for him.  Reports indicate they aren’t working for him.

Here is why.  President Obama is his own worst enemy.  He’s been caught on video saying dumb things. I guess you can get away with denying you said something that was caught on tape for a while, but as soon as the video goes viral, it’s hard to maintain your innocence.  However, when you deny saying something that was caught on tape in a video where you actually show yourself saying it, that’s a whole new kind of dumb.

Here, in a pro Barack Obama YouTube channel video (paid for by Obama for America), he claims he never made the now famous statement, “If you build your business, you didn’t do it, Someone else did that.”  This ad claims Mitt Romney is a liar by accusing the President of saying this.  But watch the last few seconds of this video and you’ll see President Obama actually say it.

Sort of reminds me of Baghdad Bob, the Iraqi Information Minister during the Gulf War. As we were bombing after Desert Storm, he was denying we were even a threat,  “They are nowhere near the airport ..they are lost in the desert…they can not read a compass…they are retarded.”

There are really two issues here:

1. The beginning of this video says that President Obama didn’t say, “If you build your business, you didn’t do it, Someone else did that.” However the end of the video shows him saying it.

2. The ad asserts that Romney agrees with Obama, but I don’t think this is very persuasive.  Romney does say that you couldn’t have a business without things like roads, but it appears that most Americans didn’t understand him to mean that you didn’t build your own business.

After viewing this ad, I think most Americans come away with the idea that Mitt Romney is pro business and President Obama is not.  This ad is counter productive for Team Obama.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
If you liked this post, read…Seven Reasons Why YOU Should Sign Up for the Art of Eloquence Newsletter

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Word of the Week: Leader

This week’s word is Leadership.  I love this quote from General George Washington to his commanders: “A leader must look and act the part if he is going to have the success needed for a proper command.”

George Washington was a great leader, so much so that he was a general and our only president to be elected unanimously.  He understood that in order to be an effective leader, you need to look and act the part.  In other words, a leader must communicate that he is worth following.

A leader is expected to inspire to command his troops or a nation.  This cannot be accomplished without the Language of Leadership.  It’s more than weilding power or even using the right words. It’s an entire package and, if you don’t have it, you will not be given a position of leadership and you cannot be effective without it.

For more information on how you can develope the Language of Leadership, click the one of the links, scroll down to the bottom of the page and download our sample lesson.

The Bible tells us what a good and true leader is and Say What You Mean: The Language of Leaderships shows you how to accomplish this in today’s world.

If you liked this post, please subscribe to our RSS feed and share the link…

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

It’s National Meaning of “is” Day!

On this day in 1998, former President Clinton dabbled in semantics during the Grand Jury hearings to clarify his relationship with Monica Lewinsky. He said, “It depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ is.”  Well, someone made this day one of those national silly holidays.  What we are supposed to do on this day, I don’t know, but it got me thinking about how difficult it is to describe certain words.  How do we define the word is?

Think about it? You can’t even define the word without using the word itself.  Is is a state of being.  It is a form of the verb to be.  According to Merriam Webster, is is defined as, “present 3d singular of be, dialect present 1st & 2nd singular of be,  dialect present plural of be”

To be or not to be, that IS the question!  How would you define the word is?  Try it!  What other words are difficult to define?  Share!

X

If you liked this post, make sure to subscribe to our RSS Feed so you don’t miss one and SUBSCRIBE to our newsletter: for even MORE communication fun, FREE gifts, Book of the Month Club and exclusive excerpts and offers we don’t share with ANYONE else but our subscribers!

X

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

Rush to Hatred

Last week a very popular political figure had to be rushed to the hospital.  No, he isn’t a senator or congressman.  He isn’t even a politician.  He is a conservative talk radio host.

Though I prayed for his recovery, it isn’t his illness that brings me to write about him today; it was the reaction of some of those who disagree with his political persuasion. It was the message they sent and the way in which they chose to communicate it.  But more than anything else, it was their rush to hatred and the language of hatred that I wish to discuss.

Several blogs and internet news media reported last week that Rush Limbaugh was taken to the hospital with chest pains.  He was reported to be in serious condition.  I found out about it on Twitter and went to the various links provided to try to learn more.  What I found was something that saddened me.

Among the well wishes and prayers were comments calling for his death and requests for him to suffer.  I won’t include here the actual words used as I find them horrific, but I wonder why people, these days, feel the need to spew hatred on those they disagree with.  Why they wish them harm?

I disagree with many people including those who have the power to affect my life in a very negative way.  I don’t wish ill upon them.  I disagree with most of what President Obama is trying to accomplish, yet I was appalled to hear that someone had plotted to kill him during the time he was running for office.  I was horrified to learn that there was a security breach in the White House when a couple crashed a party where they had access to the President and Vice President!

If you disagree with someone, what is the purpose in publicly wishing them harm?  Do people think words of hatred will endear the other side to their cause?  Show them the error of their ways?  Not likely!  Do they think that simply because they believe something different from what they believe that they are not human?  Have feelings with families who care about them?  Or is the idea just to inflict as much harm as possible?

If you truly believe in something, isn’t it your purpose to try to affect change so that others will come to adopt your beliefs?  I have never known a time when the language of hatred had caused someone to adopt the opposite opinion.  Ever!  Wouldn’t it be better to speak with civility and grace to appeal to those who disagree with you so that they will listen to what you have to say?  I have noticed, too, that many of those who speak out against “Hate Speech” are the very ones rushing to speak hatred of others simply because they disagree with them.

What we need is an effective way of communicating our beliefs.  Art of Eloquence believes it is far more effective to speak to others in love and with respect.  It isn’t a rush to heated words or stopping another from speaking that will gain the hearts of those who oppose you.  I think, instead, what some are trying to do is kill the others’ argument.  But you will not persuade another by cutting off his argument. You will only stifle your understanding of how to answer him.

Some thoughts on the language of hatred from the folks at Art of Eloquence.com.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter